Thursday, March 20, 2014

Way, Way, Off Topic

The quondam guru of PR and tabloid stories, Max Clifford, was for many years the go-to guy for any celebrity who was threatened with undesirable publicity. Clifford could negotiate with the press, usually with a successful outcome for the client.

So isn't it ironic that Mr. Clifford is now on trial (on which I have no view other than to leave it all to a jury) and that trial has thrown up allegations that he has a really small penis. What could he have charged a rich client to keep that out of the red-tops?

That's what I call irony.


  1. and that trial has thrown up allegations that he has a really small penis.
    Well true or not, he does have some of this.
    John Gibson

  2. Were Max to be prescient (as it were) he would have put a roll of socks or a banger or two in those shorts before having that picture taken. I refer, of course, to the Daily Mail piece illustrations. All for journalistic integrity, eh, DM?

    Can anyone believe thirty-year-old testimony about penis size (not that it matters, except for possibly corroboration of other testimony).

    I would be much more bothered by the reported age of one of his contacts.

    Is sex used as currency in the entertainment business? Do ducks quack?

  3. Inappropriate blog.


Posts are pre-moderated. Please bear with us if this takes a little time, but the number of bores and obsessives was getting out of hand, as were the fake comments advertising rubbish.