The quondam guru of PR and tabloid stories, Max Clifford, was for many years the go-to guy for any celebrity who was threatened with undesirable publicity. Clifford could negotiate with the press, usually with a successful outcome for the client.
So isn't it ironic that Mr. Clifford is now on trial (on which I have no view other than to leave it all to a jury) and that trial has thrown up allegations that he has a really small penis. What could he have charged a rich client to keep that out of the red-tops?
That's what I call irony.
Musings and Snippets from a recently retired JP. I served for 31 years, mostly in west London. I was Chairman of my Bench for some years, and a member of the National Bench Chairmen's Forum All cases are based on real ones, but anonymised and composited. All opinions are those of one or more individuals. JPs swear to enforce the law of the land, whether or not they approve of it. Nothing on here constitutes legal advice.
and that trial has thrown up allegations that he has a really small penis.
ReplyDeleteWell true or not, he does have some of this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=RDBobLo_edTKg&v=BobLo_edTKg
John Gibson
Were Max to be prescient (as it were) he would have put a roll of socks or a banger or two in those shorts before having that picture taken. I refer, of course, to the Daily Mail piece illustrations. All for journalistic integrity, eh, DM?
ReplyDeleteCan anyone believe thirty-year-old testimony about penis size (not that it matters, except for possibly corroboration of other testimony).
I would be much more bothered by the reported age of one of his contacts.
Is sex used as currency in the entertainment business? Do ducks quack?
Inappropriate blog.
ReplyDelete