Wednesday, August 05, 2015

More On Bloody Gavels

The Law Society Gazette has this piece that clearly disagrees with my objection to sloppy journalism that uses a gavel to illustrate any law-related story. Yes, of course it isn't that important, but it still drives me crackers.

10 comments:

  1. It is actually very important - small things can be - as it demonstrates the users' ignorance of procedure and contempt for their readers and audience (for the latter I am thinking of television & films - the wrong wigs & robes are other favourites). With so much other poor reporting, writing and dramatising, it adds to the cumulative misrepresentation in the UK Main Steam Media.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the film U71 it is claimed the Americans captured an enigma coding machine, when it was actually the Brits. When questioned about it, the director replied 'Why let fact get in the way of a great story?' The press have been doing this for years.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Surely the way to satisfy everyone is to issue magistrates and judges with gavels?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The courts are becoming auction houses anyway (in terms of people having to pay outrageous fees for very small misdemeanours) so why not?

      Delete
  4. I think we all know what little gift the bench will be buying for Bystander on Bystander's last day.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I share BS and others annoyance at gavels. Although the lovely Rob Rinder was forced to have one on his bench for his version of 'Judge Judy' apparently he absolutely refused to touch it at any time. Nevertheless it is there - along with some patriotic flags for good measure. I'd rather stick to the coat of arms thanks - much more tasteful!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would like to second "Anonymous 6 August 2015 at 10:46" motion.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Your irrational stance on gavels, BS, is becoming tiresome. I am a founding member of the Leonard Sachs Appreciation Society. Dressed in full evening attire, three of us meet every year, to roar out alliterative polysyllabic words, which none of us understands, while banging our gavels with great gusto. It's exhausting, but this country would be a better place if there were more of this sort of thing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The gavel is only an emblem for the law, even if factually incorrect one. Level crossings are decorated with cartoons of steam locomotives. Samuel Adams beer bottles actually depict Paul Revere. Barbers' poles actually derive from surgeon's premises. The Medici family's three brass balls connote a pawn broker. In the USA, there are the Democratic donkeys and the Republican elephants. A successful emblem indicates some specific identity, whether it be an individual, a profession, or a company. Historical accuracy comes second.

    ReplyDelete
  9. May I reiterate a post from way back?

    No court of law in this country uses a gavel, but the media persist in portraying them. I blame a stupid Bruce Forsyth advert for Courts Furniture Stores that ran some years ago. Courts have now gone bust. Good.

    ReplyDelete

Posts are pre-moderated. Please bear with us if this takes a little time, but the number of bores and obsessives was getting out of hand, as were the fake comments advertising rubbish.