The previous post about jury trial has attracted some interesting comments, but I have had an email, for which I am grateful, from a barrister in a respected set of criminal chambers pointing out the potential difficulties of revealing anything that happens in the jury room. I have therefore edited the post (edits in italics) to ensure that the case is not identifiable, and to remove reference to discussions. I repeat my gratitude to M'learned friend.
It is a couple of years or so since I was mentioned on the front page of the Daily Mail, and I would like to leave it at that.
Musings and Snippets from a recently retired JP. I served for 31 years, mostly in west London. I was Chairman of my Bench for some years, and a member of the National Bench Chairmen's Forum All cases are based on real ones, but anonymised and composited. All opinions are those of one or more individuals. JPs swear to enforce the law of the land, whether or not they approve of it. Nothing on here constitutes legal advice.
Many years ago someone from my office (pretty dumb but very opinionated) was on a jury and told us about it.
ReplyDeleteTerrifying!!
"You could tell he was guilty as soon as he walked into the court" was a typical comment.
Decided that I would probably opt out of a jury trial and be tried by the judge.