Thursday, March 07, 2013

Taking The Rough With The Smooth

Some days in court can be non-stop, with a constant stream of defendants coming before us for decisions on bail, mode of trial, sentencing and the rest. There might be a trial, perhaps a short one-hour job, or a two or three day case. All are interesting and potentially challenging in their own way, but just occasionally the daily list offers only tedium.  Non-CPS work such as unpaid council tax, bus fares, fishing licences can be formulaic and repetitive, especially as the overwhelming majority of defendants do not turn up. The only challenge used to be finding a realistic fine for someone with next to no money. Nowadays, we just look up a printed matrix that often gives an excessive and unfair result on to which we add the new and inflexible surcharge. Not many of us like that.




7 comments:

  1. "I mete and dole
    Unequal laws unto a savage race,
    That hoard, and sleep, and feed, and know not me"

    Cheer up, BS, tis not too late to seek a better life.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks 'Fred. Note you omitted any mention of 'the aged wife', even on International Women's Day. Shame on you!
    Kate C

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For those who didn't instantly recognise these lines, or find them on the Internet (or who couldn't be bothered to look!), they are taken from Alfred Tennyson's "Ulysses".
      Kate C

      Delete
  3. I don't think that when the laws were put on the statue book that whether Magistrates liked them or not was considered... and rightly so.
    Unfair? thats very subjective, unfair to your way of thinking possibly.

    eg I would have thought that those who failed to pay their council tax were being very unfair to the rest of us who do.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Could you perhaps comment on what would be a realistic punishment for someone with no money? A fine levied at the rate of a packet of fags a week, to be deducted from benefits, does not as far as I can see make a difference to the offender in question.

    Yes, there are certainly plenty of people on benefits for whom a few quid would make a dramatic difference, but those people, with careful budgets and little margin for unexpected events, tend not to find themselves in court.

    Is there a sentence, either within your powers or without, that is both fair and acts as a deterrent?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Several years ago there was a pilot conducted in Greater Manchester among other areas which provided at least a partial solution. An offender with at least one previous offence on the record, who committed an offence normally only punishable by a fine (or discharge), but with insufficient means to pay the sum appropriate to the offence, could be found to be "a persistent petty offender". The appropriate financial sum could then be converted into hours of unpaid work for the community (community service), allowing a realistic punishment to be imposed. Of course, that provision was more expensive than imposing an uncollectable fine which was eventually written-off, so at the end of the pilot period it disappeared never to be heard of again. A great shame, as it was a rare example of properly thought out action from the Home Office.

      Delete
  5. I don't think any sentences are a deterrent. The deterrent is the likelihood of getting caught for those who care.

    ReplyDelete

Posts are pre-moderated. Please bear with us if this takes a little time, but the number of bores and obsessives was getting out of hand, as were the fake comments advertising rubbish.