tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2727871367480602637.post5734189206506061264..comments2023-07-10T10:57:18.522+01:00Comments on The Magistrates' Blog: Weekend WorldBystander http://www.blogger.com/profile/10211688955428527960noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2727871367480602637.post-50963060448941253502014-11-12T09:55:52.283+00:002014-11-12T09:55:52.283+00:00I am happy to be proved wrong but I do not think S...I am happy to be proved wrong but I do not think S1 of Childrens Act 1989 is a lawful exception to the right to bail - at least not directly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2727871367480602637.post-23562090111069979892014-11-10T23:05:45.563+00:002014-11-10T23:05:45.563+00:00Re: the direct or indirect injury to the child. S...Re: the direct or indirect injury to the child. Section 1 of the Childrens Act 1989 places the interests of the child as paramount (sic). That trumps a lot of things, and a custody decision at a weekend is well within that rubric, I should think. No need for the new 'associated person' provision. Tony Frostnoreply@blogger.com